Would buying actually leave you better off than renting?
Example
Most comparisons treat the renter as somebody who only pays rent. They still have the deposit and the purchase costs, and for years they pay less every month. This runs both households side by side and says which year, if any, the buyer gets ahead.As of · Reader-selected contract and tax assumptions
What this answers
What the renter does with the deposit
Most comparisons quietly assume it disappears. It does not: the renter keeps it, invests it, and for years pays less every month as well. Whether buying wins depends almost entirely on what that money does, and on how long you stay.
The costs that never come back
Buying starts a long way behind
Transfer tax, the agent, the notary and the land registry are spent on day one and recovered by nobody. On an ordinary purchase they are more than a year of rent, which is why a short stay almost never favours buying.
What it does not answer
What houses and markets will actually do
Two growth rates decide this and neither is knowable. Change them by a point each and the crossing point moves by a decade – which is the honest finding, and the reason this gives a crossing year rather than a verdict.